No 2 No 2 a Mayor 4 Nottingham on May 3.

The No to a Mayor for Nottingham campaign is based on repeating over and over again the phrase “£1 Million Tory Extra Mayor”.

I was not intending to comment on this, it being so facile, but since landing back in Nottingham this week a few people have asked me about it, and asked me to write about it, so in the absence of anything more constructive coming out of the No campaign … here goes.

I’ve been asked how they get to the claimed cost of £1 Million. This is how it’s done.

1. Start with government figures for the cost of a referendum (£300k) and later an election (£400k). (Keep quiet about the fact that the election cost should really be half that (at most) because we will already be electing a Police Commissioner on the same day.)

2. Dream up an office cost that is greater than the current cost of the office of the Leader of the council even though the chairs, desks, computers and support staff are all ready and waiting in Loxley House**.

3. Pick from thin air a salary – over four years – for the mayor that’s way above the allowances currently being paid to the Leader and Deputy Leader (both of which will be saved of course) and almost 50% more than is currently being paid to mayors elsewhere (except in London).

4. Add it all up and then round it up to £1 Million (because that’s a big, scary number and scaring people is the name of this game).

I’ve been asked what they mean by Extra. Extra to what?

1. Extra to the Leader of the Council? No. The post of Leader will go if we have a mayor.

2. Extra to the Lord Mayor? It’s nothing to do with the – not directly elected, purely ceremonial – Lord Mayor.

I’ve been asked why the mayor has to be a Tory (really, I have, by a doctor) and I’ve been asked why Labour doesn’t support it.

1. Of course it doesn’t have to be a Tory (remember they are trying to scare you) and anyway it probably wouldn’t be in Labour-stronghold Nottingham.

2. Opposition to elected mayors is not national Labour Party policy, it’s Nottingham Labour policy. In other cities (Birmingham, Liverpool) the Labour Party is saying Yes to a Mayor.

3. Elected mayors were introduced by Tony Blair’s Labour government. The Tories are now running with a Labour idea at faster speed and to greater effect. What next? Pretending that Academies were not created by Labour? That it wasn’t a Labour government that peddled lies to take us to war in Iraq? Come on.

“£1 Million Tory Extra Mayor” has a better ring to it, is indeed scarier than “Maybe about £700,000 (lots of which is a one-off cost) probably Labour, not really extra Mayor” but it’s just a little disingenuous, a phrase more suited to propaganda than to debate. It’s spin (and I should know).

Running such a trite campaign suggests the Nottingham Labour Party (and their trade union allies pushing the same message) are either insulting the intelligence of Nottingham voters or don’t credit Nottingham voters with having much intelligence. This week I’ve heard the No campaign materials described as “pathetic” and of an activist embarrassed by them.

I’ve also been asked – more times than is funny – if I’m going to run for Mayor of Nottingham myself.

1. The Leader of the Council on Radio Nottingham last Thursday refused to rule himself out, even though he’s saying No to a Mayor for Nottingham.

2. So neither will I.

Ha Ha.


** Loxley House is Nottingham City Council’s HQ building where No campaign materials have been placed on desks this week. I’ve been told of former colleagues who nevertheless support moving to an elected mayor but are reluctant to say so out loud.

I was also on Radio Nottingham talking about a Mayor for Nottingham last week. You can listen to that here if you like. I come in about 1hr 48 minutes into the show. Update – sorry the BBC have taken this link down now.

If you like anything you read here would you please email it to a few like-minded friends and share it on twitter and facebook? There are buttons below. Thanks.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to No 2 No 2 a Mayor 4 Nottingham on May 3.

  1. Seems to me that anyone voting against having an elected mayor ought to be excluded from running for the position if we end up with one.

    I mean, you know; let’s talk about putting one’s money where one’s mouth is.

  2. Graeme Mulvaney says:

    I love the way it’s all a Tory plot to dilute the power of local Labour councils, when it was actually proposed by a fanatical exponent of centralised government – devolution only happened to get rid of the noisy bits.

    There are similar “facts” floating around in Coventry – I’d just like to see us have a fair and open debate about the pros and cons, but the no campaign has, from the outset, said that anybody supporting a mayor must have a vested interest – neatly side-steeping the fact the it’s the most vocal opponents are the ones with the most to lose if the system changes.

    I don’t have a problem with the current leader standing and then running his office as if he were leader of the council, at least you’d get some stability and vision, Coventry has been borderline Labour/Conservative/Noc for years – the city centre is a shambles, every time the majority party loses control the new guys spend half their first term tweaking.

    Elected mayors can bring strong leadership and consistency to divided cities, regardless of their affiliations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s